After months of debate and media coverage, the Texas State Board of Education has approved changes to their states social studies curriculum. For the most part, these changes replace what the conservative board members saw as “liberal bias” with a more conservative friendly framing of our nation’s history.
This is complete bullshit.
Now, I am willing to believe that there may be some left leaning bias in some textbooks. But there is a big difference between correcting said bias, and creating a bias of your own. Many of the things being altered have been accepted by historians for years, so if you do want to correct any perceived bias, you would probably want to consult them about it, right?
Or, you could do what Texas did and listen to a freaking dentist who has no background in history at all. But he sure does love Jesus.
And that’s kind of important, as a lot of the changes made have to do with giving religion a more prominent role in our nations history. Does it have some significance? Yes. But by focusing on the impact religion had on the Founding Fathers, while ignoring their rational for keeping Church and State separate is historically dishonest. In fact, it’ unethical. It’s whitewashing our nation’s founding to serve a specific ideological narrative. How bad is it? They have removed Thomas Jefferson from the history books because he coined the terms “Separation of Church and State”. Basically, they are trying to promote their warped view that America is only for Christians, and get that into kid’s heads at an early age. Kind of like brainwashing.
“The Enlightenment was not the only philosophy on which these revolutions were based,” board member Cynthia Dunbar stated. Yes, that’s true. But by your own logic, religion was not the only philosophy these revolutions were based either. So you have just admitted that you are cherry-picking what parts of their ideology you want to teach. That’s not history, genius.
Other changes include:
- teaching that McCarthy was vindicated in his communist witch hunt (he wasn’t)
- giving Presidents Nixon and Reagan more prominant roles
- ensuring students learn about the conservative resurgance of the 80′s, and study such groups as the Moral Majority and National Rifel Association
- denying coverage of Latino leaders and movements
Many of these are covered in the New York Times article here.
Again, it’s important to note that none of these changes were proposed by actual historians. Which begs the question, why do they get to decide what are children are taught? They have no more expertise than I do, can make up a curriculum? Inject my personal beliefs in history and teach them as facts? Because that is essentially what Texas has done. In “standing up to the experts” they have forgotten why we have experts in the first place: they tend to know more about their field than we do. Kind of like how a dentist knows more about teeth than a historian would.
So Texas, if you want to live in your own aternate reality, go right ahead. But don’t take the rest of us down with you.
